Published in Nacional number 687, 2009-01-13

Autor: Marko Biočina, Petra Horvat

A DEEP DARK HOLE IN THE BUDGET

Secret CPF deficit of 316 million kuna

There has been no transparency in the way the Croatian Privatization Fund has spent billions of kuna to bail out state-owned companies; this year it will have to repay commercial bank loans to the tune of 43.5 million euro

Damir Polancec, Grga Ivezic and Hans ZollnerDamir Polancec, Grga Ivezic and Hans ZollnerNacional has come into possession of documents that show that the Croatian Privatization Fund (CPF) will have to pay commercial banks in excess of 316 million kuna in 2009 to make payments on loans taken out over the past decade. These are debts that were not included in the Croatian Privatization Fund's financial plan, and likewise were not included in the national budget.

The documents Nacional has are also proof of the catastrophic business policies of the Croatian Privatization Fund. Over the past decade the Fund has, in a fashion entirely lacking transparency and without applying professional criteria, spent billions of kuna coming to the rescue of numerous state-owned companies. The Fund, at the behest of the political authorities, bought up their debts, issued short-term loans and granted them financial aid.

This was done to temporary put off the failure of some companies and the ensuing social unrest, even though it was clear that these companies would never be in a position to pay the state back the money they had received. This business policy has resulted in million-kuna debts at the Fund, and although they are nowhere evident on the institution's balance sheets, they are from year to year an ever-growing financial burden on Croatians. The result of this practice is the fact that Croatia will, in 2009, have to pay off the loans that the Fund has taken out for the account of some companies that have long ceased to exist or have been sold off to private owners.

And so the Croatian Privatization Fund, conceived as an institution that would, through the sale of state-owned property, make a significant profit to the benefit of the national budget, has become a major money loser and a significant burden on the national budget. What is more, given that these obligations are hidden and that there is no money earmarked for them either in the Fund's budget or in the national budget, it is easy to assume that paying them off will probably be financed from funds collected from the sale of the remainder of the assets under the Fund's control. And it can be taken for granted that the 2009 budget will gain practically nothing from the sale of state-owned assets, but that all of the funds collected in that fashion will be used to cover current debts. According to the official Fund documentation Nacional has come into possession of, most of the 43.5 million euro that has to be returned by the institution in 2009 is the result of loans that the CPF took out from commercial banks. To prevent the failure, namely, of some companies in state ownership, Government made direct decisions or gave orders through its representatives on the Fund's board of directors that the Fund take out loans from commercial banks. These funds were used for the most part for two purposes. The state would buy up the outstanding claims banks had towards state owned companies and prevented their bankruptcies, or issue them short-term loans enabling the companies to operate normally.


Nacional's source, well in the know when it comes to the situation in the Croatian Privatization Fund, feels that the current financial situation in the Fund is a result of years of poor management with national property. "There is in theory nothing bad in the state helping out companies it owns, but that help makes sense only if it results in the improved operations of these companies in the future. The problem is that decisions on financial aid were made without any financial analysis, only on the basis of political criteria. The state bought social peace, approved massive sums of financial assistance for companies, which in no way restructured their operations. Many remain to this day on the brink of failure. So it turns out that the state, by way of the Fund, spent billions of kuna to put off the inevitable." An example of this way of doing business is an 80 million kuna loan that the Fund took out in 2003 from Rijecka Bank, now the Erste Bank. The money was rerouted to the Dalmacija ferroalloy factory in Dugi Rat, as a short-term loan.

Production at the factory ground to a halt, the workers were laid off, and the attractive plot of land on which the factory was located was sold for 8.5 million euro to foreign investors. Nevertheless, more than five years after production ceased, the loan is due for repayment, and the Fund will this year have to pay Erste Bank 8.8 million euro. So, in the final tally Croatia is left without a large industrial firm and the land it was located on, the workers lost their jobs, and the entire Fund transaction ended up at a loss of 300 thousand euro. The Dalmacija case is only one in a series in which the Fund spend a significant amount of money helping out state-owned companies, even thought the justification for these moves, business-wise, was very questionable. What is more, the Fund assumed the debts of some companies in very peculiar arrangements. In 2002, for example, Government ordered the Fund to buy up Zagrebacka Bank's claims towards the PIK Vrbovec company. The claims amounted to somewhat over 88.5 million kuna, and Zagrebacka Bank sold the claims at a significant discount, at a price of 55.7 million kuna, and at the same time issued the Fund a loan to settle the claim.

This is an ethically very questionable arrangement, because a state institution returned the bank an assumed debt through a loan issued by that same bank. From that perspective it is very questionable what the real discount was that Zagrebacka Bank approved for the CPF, and what part it compensated by way of interest on the loan it issued. A similar deal was struck by the Croatian Privatization Fund in the case of the IPK agricultural firm out of Osijek. The company owed Slavonska Bank in excess of 20.6 million euro. The state bought the claims, and collected the money needed through a loan from the Hypo Alpe Adria Bank, the owner of Slavonska Bank. These kinds of deals were made during the coalition government of Ivica Racan, and since the HDZ took power the Croatian Privatization Fund's chief creditor has been Hrvatska postanska banka (Croatian Postal Bank, HPB), a bank owned by the state. Just in 2007 the CPF took out three short-term loans from that bank, worth in excess of 13.5 million euro.

Slavko LinicSlavko LinicThe money was spent on short-term loans to some state owned companies like the Vjesnik daily, the Bizovac thermal springs, Borovo, Imota, KIM, Elcom, Adrichem and others. These loans are due for repayment this year and the Fund will have to, with interest, set aside 14.7 million euro to cover them. Just a little less, 14 million euro, will have to be put aside by the Fund to settle the loan the CPF took out at the Hypo Alpe Adria Bank in May of last year. All in all, the Fund will have to come up with 43.5 million euro to settle loan debts in 2009. The financing of a small part of that debt, interest payments of 4.1 million euro, has been foreseen in its financial plan for 2009. But the repayment of the principal of 39.2 million euro has not been foreseen anywhere in the expenditures side of the 2009 financial plan. That is why it is a logical assumption that the Fund will try to cover these obligations with funds gained from the sale of the state property in its portfolio. In business plans the Fund is otherwise classified in a special category, that of "inflow". The reason for that is the fact that the Fund should immediately send these funds to the national budget or put them at the disposal of the Croatian Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The funds should not be used by the Fund to finance its own operations. Nevertheless, a planned 100 million kuna from the sale of state owned property could in the end be used to pay off CPF loans. It is hard to expect then that the Croatian budget will profit in the coming year from the privatisation of state owned property, what is more, it is possible that the Ministry of Finance will, in the end, have to provide financial assistance to the Fund for it to be able to settle all of its obligations.

The data from the documents Nacional has in its possession are proof of the catastrophic business policy that the Fund has lead for years. The result of a lack of professionalism and the political influence exerted on the management of the institution have resulted in massive losses that will, in the end, be borne by Croatian taxpayers. The Croatian Privatization Fund has at this moment over a billion kuna in claims towards companies that are in part or majority state ownership. 28 companies now owe it money, along with a number of cumulative loans the Fund assumed from the Croatian Postal Bank (HPB). The biggest debtor is Hrvatske zeljeznice (Croatian Railways) with 319 million kuna of debt, followed by Borovo with 180 and the Vjesnik daily with 90 million kuna of unsettled obligations. Most of these companies continue to be in bad shape, on the brink of bankruptcy and it is quite certain that they will not be able to repay the money they have received from the CPF.

Even if the CPF succeeds, in the privatisation process, in finding investors interested in buying some of the debtor companies, it is quite certain that these companies will insist on having a part or the entire debt written off in the end. That is why it is quite certain that the Fund will continue to make losses over the coming years because it will have to pay off the debts of these companies. If one adds to that the fact that a further 1.4 billion kuna that the CPF spent covering the losses of state owned companies was, in the end, paid by the finance ministry on the basis of state guarantees, the magnitude of the losses to Croatia this way of running the Fund has caused becomes clear.

Spendthrift CPF boss ignores Suker's directives

■ Even though finance minister Ivan Suker has, as a result of the economic recession, announced strict savings measures in state services, his former assistant and the current president of the Croatian Privatization Fund, Vedran Duvnjak, is not exactly sticking to these directives. In late October of last year Duvnjak rented a luxurious Audi A6 from the Pupek company at the Fund's expense. The rent costs the CPF, and thereby the taxpayer, 17,250 kuna a month. It is a massive rent, and some auto dealerships have told Nacional that with that kind of monthly expenditure a similar vehicle could be purchased through leasing, and not just rented out.
■ The reason for this inflated price is likely in the fact that the contract was made out for one month only, with a clause stipulating that it is automatically extended until cancelled. Had Duvnjak signed a contract on a longer period, it is very likely that the price would have been lower.
■ Suspicions that Duvnjak intended to keep the vehicle for the entire year under this arrangement arise from the CPF's financial plan for next year. Even though most expenditures have been cut in 2009, those for rental fees and leases have more than tripled from 2008. What is more, in the frame of collecting vehicle rental offers Duvnjak rejected the offer of one auto dealership that offered a smaller model, the Audi A4, for a monthly rent of 12 thousand kuna, and picked a 5 thousand kuna more expensive model. It is quite unclear why Duvnjak opted to rent vehicles, given that the CPF has its own fleet and employs drivers. And while the Fund's fleet has for the most part grown old, a few years ago the then Fund president Damir Ostovic modernised it with two new Subaru Legacy's.
■ According to unconfirmed rumour, one of these vehicles broke down when Duvnjak as driving it, and was left for months at one of the exits on the Zagreb-Split motorway, after which all trace of it was lost. The other Subaru is still at the Fund, and it is strange that Duvnjak does not use this vehicle.
■ Besides, it should be pointed out that Duvnjak, as an employee of the Fund, does not have the right to drive a vehicle in the A6 class, which is, according to the ordinance on the allocation of official vehicles, reserved only for top state officials. According to this ordinance, officials of the Croatian Privatization Fund have the right to drive Audi A4's, just the kind of vehicle Duvnjak rejected.

The peculiar arrangements of the SDP government

■ During the rule of the coalition government the most powerful person in the Privatization Fund was allegedly Slavko Linic, and he is responsible for an entire series of ethically very questionable deals. It was then a customary practice for the Fund to buy up the claims of banks towards state owned companies, and to finance these transactions by taking out loans with those same banks.

Related articles

The large Chinese company China Airport Construction Group wants to participate in the construction and financing of the new terminal at Zagreb Airport, but wants the right to select the project design

China's CACGC wants to build the Zagreb Airport

Diplomatic and economic relations between Croatia and China are intensifying, with new interest of Chinese companies to invest in Croatia, which was… Više